How would you like a magic formula to beat the market? A formula that was simple, easy to use, quick to apply, and almost certain to deliver superior returns over time?
That's exactly what Joel Greenblatt claims to offer in his best-seller, The Little Book that Beats the Market. Just reissued in a new edition called (you guessed it) The Little Book that Still Beats the Market, Greenblatt's book has spawned a hedge fund, a series of structured products and a specialised market index. More importantly, it has inspired thousands of investors to build portfolios based on his simple seven-step process.
So who is Joel Greenblatt? What's his not-so-secret formula? What can we learn from it? And why isn't everybody doing it if it's so successful?
Unlike many people spruiking a particular trading philosophy, Greenblatt has an impressive record of success to make investors sit up and listen. In 1985 he founded Gotham Capital, a private investment partnership that delivered annualised returns of more than 50% before being closed to investors in 1994. He is also a professor on the adjunct faculty of Columbia Business School – so he's well grounded in the theory, as well as the practice.
Greenblatt offers a few different versions of his investment process, depending on how hands-on you want to be, but the basic elements are still the same:
As you can see, Greenblatt's method is based on just two fundamental ratios: return on capital and earnings yield. Together, they give him an insight into both a company's long-term performance and the value it currently offers investors.
Earnings yield is simply PE turned upside down – earnings per share divided by price per share. This is the value part of the magic formula, revealing which stocks are currently delivering a big share of corporate earnings for a small price.
Return on capital is the performance part of the formula. Like return on equity, it's a measure of the earnings a company generates from a given level of investment. Greenblatt calculates it slightly differently to some others:
On the earnings side, he prefers to use earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), rather than reported earnings, because that removes any distorting effects from the different tax regimes and interest rates companies may be subject to. Meanwhile, his capital calculation is designed to come as close as possible to understanding exactly how much capital the company has had to employ to generate those earnings.
Those are the technicalities, but the key point is this: as an investor, you want to put your money into companies that generate the highest possible return on their capital. After all, some of that capital belongs to you.
Now, I'm not suggesting you should blindly follow Greenblatt's method. But it does hold some interesting lessons for investors – especially since there is some evidence that it works. Greenblatt's back-testing suggests that $100,000 invested in the US market in September 1999 using the magic formula would have been worth $388,860 ten years later, a rise of 288%. That compares to 1.5% decline in the S&P500.
So here are my key takeouts from Greenblatt's approach:
Happy trading!
Julia Lee Equities Analyst Bell Direct Have you started trading with Bell Direct for just $15 a trade? Register now for free.